| Front Page | Forum | IRC |
Raiders make off with bull semen: Posted 11/08/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/7715364.stm
Quote: |
E-mail error ends up on road sign: Posted 11/01/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/7702913.stm
Quote: |
Death at show fuels US gun debate: Posted 10/28/08 by Cybmatthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7694560.stm
Quote: |
'Expensive' Placebos Work Better Than 'Cheap' Ones: Posted 10/24/08 by iv81
Odd Experiment Suggests a High Price Tag May Be a Formula for Pain Relief The more expensive your pain medications are, the better the relief you get from taking them — even if they're fake. A new study suggests the more expensive a treatment appears, the greater its placebo effect. (Photodisc)That's according to a study published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which suggests that sugar pills labeled as expensive drugs relieve pain better than sugar pills labeled as discounted drugs. Researchers often compare real drugs to sugar pills in medical studies to account for the placebo effect, in which the illusion of taking medicine alone can cause symptoms to disappear. But Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist at Duke University in Durham, N.C., and a team of collaborators from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology compared the placebo effect of the marketing that people are asked to swallow along with their medicine. In the study, 82 volunteers were subjected to a series of electric shocks — a standard research protocol for measuring pain thresholds. They were then given a placebo pill alongside a fake drug company brochure for the fictitious drug "Veladone-Rx," — ostensibly a new fast-acting painkiller made in China. The only catch was that half of the test subjects received brochures showing that the drug had been marked down from the original price of $2.50 a pill to 10 cents a pill. These modified brochures also included circled fine print which suggested that the pills were manufactured in China. After participants went through the shocks again, 85 percent in the full-price group reported pain relief from their sugar pill, while only 61 percent in the discount group reported pain relief. Placebos Make Good Medicine "In a way, placebo is a big part of medicine," said Ariely, who wrote an entire book on the subject called "Predictably Irrational." The placebo effect goes beyond simple perception. In fact, people taking placebos for pain relief will secrete higher levels of the body's natural painkillers called endogenous opioids, said Ariely. "But the interesting thing is, we can't close our eyes and say, 'please can I get some pain relief?'" said Ariely. "It's under our control, but not under our control consciously." The placebo effect is so powerful, it can help 25-50 percent of patients with migraines, said Dr. Timothy A. Collins, associate clinical professor of neurology at Duke University Medical Center. "It can even help with unexpected medical conditions such as with the skin disorder psoriasis, which has a 27 percent favorable placebo rate for patients, or a 16 percent placebo rate with Parkinson's disease." But while many doctors are quite aware of the placebo effect, some may not be aware of all the elements that go into it — including the price of the pill, the drug ads on TV, or even the physician's attitude towards the drug, said Ariely. Get What You Pay For, or Buyer Beware? A common reason to go after a brand-name drug is the popular saying "you get what you pay for." "It's true with cars, it's true with other consumables," said Dr. Nortin Hadler, professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "If you buy a lemon and drive it home, you're going to know in a hurry. "But when it comes to health care issues, you don't know it in a hurry — you don't know," Hadler said. Dr. Carmen Green, director of Pain Medicine Research at the University of Michigan Health System, has frequently experienced this phenomenon in her practice. "Patients come in and say, I saw this on TV and this is what I want," said Green. "But often there are other drugs that are available that are cheaper, or should be tried first." Besides occasionally annoying doctors, the drive towards more expensive drugs might have costs that go beyond the pockets of people watching drug ads. "We're all paying for higher health care costs, whether you have government insurance or private insurance," said Green. Yet, not all is doom and gloom. Ariely and Hadler believe doctors can turn the placebo effect around for the advantage of both the doctor and the patient. Office Visit: Expanding Placebo "It really puts a new twist on how we think about reality," said Ariely, who questioned how price and marketing affects the potency of drugs given out in free packets, drugs given in discount rates, or even drugs that come in boring bottles. For Hadler, the study might convince doctors to develop their own positive marketing for a treatment. In his own studies, Hadler has found that the way a physician describes a drug can change how much a patient will follow through with a treatment regimen. "Compliance goes down when you go through all the side effects listed for the drug," said Hadler. "But if you say, 'This is the best thing ever, side effects are rare,' people will respond positively." http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/Story?id=4386984&page=1 |
God gets off on a technicality: Posted 10/16/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7673591.stm
Quote: |
YouTube to McCain: You Made Your DMCA Bed, Lie in It: Posted 10/15/08 by iv81
YouTube on Tuesday rebuffed a request from John McCain's presidential campaign to examine fair-use issues more carefully before yanking campaign videos in response to DMCA takedown notices. "Lawyers and judges constantly disagree about what does and does not constitute fair-use," YouTube's general counsel Zahavah Levine wrote in a letter Tuesday. "No number of lawyers could possibly determine with a reasonable level of certainty whether all the videos for which we receive disputed takedown notices qualify as fair-use." "We hope that as a content uploader, you have gained a sense of some of the challenges we face everyday in operating YouTube," he added. The McCain campaign on Monday fired off a letter to YouTube complaining that the company had acted too quickly to take down McCain's videos in response to copyright infringement notices. McCain campaign general counsel Trevor Potter argued that several of the removed ads, which had used excerpts of television footage, fall under the four-factor doctrine of fair-use, and shouldn't have been removed. But citing the DMCA, a controversial copyright law that McCain voted to approve a decade ago, Levine pointed out that YouTube risks being sued itself if it doesn't respond promptly to takedown notices. "If … service providers do not remove the content to such notice, they do so at their own risk because they lose their safe harbor,"he wrote. Further, Levine argued, the fair-use analysis is complicated, and the creators of the videos are better equipped to perform it. The uploader can then issue a DMCA counter-notice if they believe they're on solid legal ground, and YouTube will restore the video. "YouTube does not possess the requisite information about the content in user-uploaded videos to make a determination as to whether a particular takedown notice includes a valid claim of infringement," Levine wrote. "The claimant and the uploader, not YouTube, hold all of the relevant information in this regard, including the source of any content used, the ownership rights to the content, and any licensing arrangements in place between the parties." "The real problem here is individuals and entities that abuse the DMCA takedown process," he added. "We look forward to working with Senator (or President) McCain on ways to combat abuse of the DMCA takedown process on YouTube, including by way of example, strengthening the fair-use doctrine, so that intermediaries like us can rely on this important doctrine with a measure of business certainty." http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/10/youtube-to-mcca.html |
haus majority gene found: Posted 10/07/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7657092.stmQuote: |
Chicago Woman Wins House on eBay for $1.75: Posted 10/04/08 by BLooD ReDD
SAGINAW, Michigan — With a winning bid of just $1.75, a Chicago woman has won an auction for an abandoned home in Saginaw, Michigan. Joanne Smith, 30, recently was the top bidder for the home during an auction on eBay, The Saginaw News reported. Her bid was one of eight for the home. "I am going to try and sell it," she told the newspaper. "I don't have any plans to move to Saginaw." Smith said she hasn't seen the property or visited Saginaw, which has been hard-hit by economic troubles in recent years. There's a notice on the door of the home saying a foreclosure hearing is pending, the newspaper said. She must pay about $850 in back taxes and yard cleanup costs. The Saginaw News said it could not reach the seller, Southern Investments LLC, for comment. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,431306,00.html |
Boy fed zoo reptiles to crocodile: Posted 10/03/08 by NickJames?Quote: It's the reincarnated spirit of Steve Irwin. Stay tuned for new Animal Planet show staring this kid in the future. |
Astlee, best act ever?: Posted 10/01/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7646807.stmQuote: oh lawd... also Quote: is why i hate mtv. especially for tokio hotel, i havent even heard their music and have only heard of them from about a month ago so how the fuck are they up for best act ever....? mtv should be set on fire |
Nobel judge: U.S. too ignorant to compete: Posted 10/01/08 by BLooD ReDD
STOCKHOLM, Sweden (AP) -- Bad news for American writers hoping for a Nobel Prize next week: the top member of the award jury believes the United States is too insular and ignorant to compete with Europe when it comes to great writing. British author Doris Lessing holds the 2007 Nobel Prize in Literature in London, England. Counters the head of the U.S. National Book Foundation: "Put him in touch with me, and I'll send him a reading list." As the Swedish Academy enters final deliberations for this year's award, permanent secretary Horace Engdahl said it's no coincidence that most winners are European. "Of course there is powerful literature in all big cultures, but you can't get away from the fact that Europe still is the center of the literary world ... not the United States," he told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview Tuesday. He said the 16-member award jury has not selected this year's winner, and dropped no hints about who was on the short list. Americans Philip Roth and Joyce Carol Oates usually figure in speculation, but Engdahl wouldn't comment on any names. Speaking generally about American literature, however, he said U.S. writers are "too sensitive to trends in their own mass culture," dragging down the quality of their work. "The U.S. is too isolated, too insular. They don't translate enough and don't really participate in the big dialogue of literature," Engdahl said. "That ignorance is restraining." His comments were met with fierce reactions from literary officials across the Atlantic. "You would think that the permanent secretary of an academy that pretends to wisdom but has historically overlooked Proust, Joyce, and Nabokov, to name just a few non-Nobelists, would spare us the categorical lectures," said David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker. "And if he looked harder at the American scene that he dwells on, he would see the vitality in the generation of Roth, Updike, and DeLillo, as well as in many younger writers, some of them sons and daughters of immigrants writing in their adopted English. None of these poor souls, old or young, seem ravaged by the horrors of Coca-Cola." Harold Augenbraum, executive director of the foundation which administers the National Book Awards, said he wanted to send Engdahl a reading list of U.S. literature. "Such a comment makes me think that Mr. Engdahl has read little of American literature outside the mainstream and has a very narrow view of what constitutes literature in this age," he said. "In the first place, one way the United States has embraced the concept of world culture is through immigration. Each generation, beginning in the late 19th century, has recreated the idea of American literature." He added that this is something the English and French are discovering as immigrant groups begin to take their place in those traditions. The most recent American to win the award was Toni Morrison in 1993. Other American winners include Saul Bellow, John Steinbeck and Ernest Hemingway. As permanent secretary, Engdahl is a voting member of and spokesman for the secretive panel that selects the winners of what many consider the most prestigious award in literature. The academy often picks obscure writers and hardly ever selects best-selling authors. It regularly faces accusations of snobbery, political bias and even poor taste. Since Japanese writer Kenzaburo Oe won the award in 1994, the selections have had a distinct European flavor. Nine of the subsequent laureates were Europeans, including last year's winner, Doris Lessing of Britain (though Lessing often writes about her life in southern Africa). Of the other four, one was from Turkey and the others from South Africa, China and Trinidad. All had strong ties to Europe. Engdahl said Europe draws literary exiles because it "respects the independence of literature" and can serve as a safe haven. "Very many authors who have their roots in other countries work in Europe, because it is only here where you can be left alone and write, without being beaten to death," he said. "It is dangerous to be an author in big parts of Asia and Africa." The Nobel Prize announcements start next week with the medicine award on Monday, followed by physics, chemistry, peace and economics. Next Thursday is a possible date for the literature prize, but the Swedish Academy by tradition only gives the date two days before. Engdahl suggested the announcement date could be a few weeks away, saying "it could take some time" before the academy settles on a name. Each Nobel Prize includes a $1.3 million purse, a gold medal and a diploma. The awards are handed out December 10, the anniversary of prize founder Alfred Nobel's death in 1896. http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/books/09/30/nobel.literature.ap/index.html |
NO MO BAILOUT: Posted 09/29/08 by FFSFAMILYhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7641733.stmQuote: |
Palin Claimed Dinosaurs And People Coexisted: Posted 09/29/08 by iv81
Soon after Sarah Palin was elected mayor of the foothill town of Wasilla, Alaska, she startled a local music teacher by insisting in casual conversation that men and dinosaurs coexisted on an Earth created 6,000 years ago -- about 65 million years after scientists say most dinosaurs became extinct -- the teacher said. After conducting a college band and watching Palin deliver a commencement address to a small group of home-schooled students in June 1997, Wasilla resident Philip Munger said, he asked the young mayor about her religious beliefs. Palin told him that "dinosaurs and humans walked the Earth at the same time," Munger said. When he asked her about prehistoric fossils and tracks dating back millions of years, Palin said "she had seen pictures of human footprints inside the tracks," recalled Munger, who teaches music at the University of Alaska in Anchorage and has regularly criticized Palin in recent years on his liberal political blog, called Progressive Alaska. The idea of a "young Earth" -- that God created the Earth about 6,000 years ago, and dinosaurs and humans coexisted early on -- is a popular strain of creationism. Though in her race for governor she called for faith-based "intelligent design" to be taught along with evolution in Alaska's schools, Gov. Palin has not sought to require it, state educators say. In a widely-circulated interview, Matt Damon said of Palin, "I need to know if she really think that dinosaurs were here 4000 years ago. I want to know that, I really do. Because she's gonna have the nuclear codes." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html |
Rotting teeth photos added to cigarette packs: Posted 09/28/08 by BLooD ReDD
LONDON (Reuters) - Gruesome pictures of rotting teeth and throat cancer tumours will appear on all tobacco products in Britain from next month as the government steps up its campaign to encourage the country's 10 million smokers to quit. The images will be printed on the back of cigarette packs to illustrate written health warnings introduced in 2003, the Department of Health said on Saturday. The photos also include a flaccid cigarette to depict male impotence and a comparison of healthy and tar-filled lungs. Smoking is Britain's single killer, causing the premature death each year of 87,000 people in England alone. "These new stark picture warnings emphasise the harsh realities of continuing to smoke," said Liam Donaldson, the government's chief medical officer. Anti-smoking charity ASH welcomed the move, which follows similar campaigns around the world. "Sadly, smoking is so addictive that even with these grotesque warnings it won't be enough to stop everybody smoking overnight," said ASH Research Director Amanda Sandford. "But for those who are motivated to quit it could be the final step they need." The charity is lobbying the government to go further by putting the photos on the front of packs. The Department of Health said its hands are tied by the rules of a 2001 European Union directive on tobacco health warnings, which also covers which pictures can be displayed. But it said it had made representations to the European Commission seeking to increase the size of the pictures as well as placing them on pack fronts. ASH also wants all commercial branding removed from packs, an initiative currently subject to a government consultation. Research shows that young people presented with plain tobacco packets found them less attractive, the charity said. Canada in 2001 was the first country to put photo warnings on cigarette packs. In Europe, Belgium and Romania have already followed suit, but Britain will be the first in the European Union to put the images on all tobacco products, including hand-rolling tobacco and cigars. Smoking has been banned in enclosed public spaces across Britain since July 2007. http://uk.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUKTRE48Q01Z20080927 |
Church apologises to Charles Darwin over theory of evolution: Posted 09/15/08 by iv81
THE Church of England will make an official apology to naturalist Charles Darwin for criticising his famous theory of evolution Coming 126 years after his death, the church's apology will focus on how wrong it was for senior bishops in the past to misunderstand and attack Darwin's theory about man being descended from apes. Senior church officials will post the apology in the form of an article written by the Reverend Dr Malcolm Brown on the church's website tomorrow. "Charles Darwin, 200 years from your birth (in 1809), the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still,'' the article says, according to extracts printed by The Mail on Sunday newspaper. "But the struggle for your reputation is not over yet, and the problem is not just your religious opponents but those who falsely claim you in support of their own interests.'' But the apology by Dr Brown, who is the director of mission and public affairs of the Archbishops' Council, has been dismissed as "pointless'' by Darwin's great great grandson Andrew Darwin. "Why bother? he said. "When an apology is made after 200 years, it's not so much to right a wrong, but to make the person or organisation making the apology feel better.'' But Dr Brown says everyone makes mistakes, the church included. "When a big new idea emerges that changes the way people look at the world, it's easy to feel that every old idea, every certainty, is under attack and then to do battle against the new insights,'' he writes. "The church made that mistake with Galileo's astronomy and has since realised its error. "Some Church people did it again in the 1860s with Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection. "So it is important to think again about Darwin's impact on religious thinking, then and now.'' Dr Brown said there was nothing incompatible between Darwin's scientific theories and Christian teaching. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24345772-5016574,00.html |
|
The posts on this page are automatically added without review. Their content does not reflect the views of the administration. Posts are current as of 21:14. © 2007 Flaming Houses Productions. |